8/12: 2017 Inquiry Overview

2017 Inquiry Overview

8th December 2017

As the year draws to an end it is time for me to share the findings of my 2017 inquiry. This year's inquiry was based around creating independent learners within my Level 2 class. I noticed early on that as a whole the group was quite dependent.  More information explaining the start to my inquiry process can be found here. A further post outlining the progress I had made can be found here.

What progress did I make?
I really struggled to find my way and start my inquiry. I was unsure where to start. Soon after I realised I was struggling to start was because I was unsure what an independent learner looks, sounds and feels like, therefore unsure what I needed to change in my practise. After starting to look into techniques I realised a lot of things I had been already doing in class were forms of strategy, for example the use of rewards and punishment for motivation. However, these weren't proving very successful.

From here I ensured to use student voice more. This was done through collating student voice via Google Forms on my teaching style and the learning activities I was using. This was to let them show preference of how they like to learn, what they like and what they want to change. From here when we were completing activities I was able to link these back to the feedback and why I was doing something in a certain way. This proved to be slightly effective but it also helped students to realise they didn't actually know how they like to learn. I started to reiterate why we were doing certain tasks. Students said they found more purpose in the activities when they understood why we were doing it. However, I soon learnt that this also meant that only if it related to the assessment that they would find it important.

Example of student results from Google Form

 I also introduced the use of Google Classroom. This allowed students to find all resources and notifications in the one place and receive email notifications about them as well. This meant students were able to spend more time completing their work rather than creating copies etc. Upon reflecting on this yes it made it easier for both myself and the students - yet it did not help create independent learners.

Another strategy I trailed was the Release of Learning. I completed this process when preparing students for their 2.7 assessment. This was completed as follows:
Part 1 - break down of assessment with teacher, what certain words mean, what are the questions asking us to do, what sentence starters could we use, example answers. Students can use this information to answer questions and complete PMIs
Part 2 - Students working with a partner to brainstorm answers to questions & PMIs
Part 3 - Students completing the questions and PMIs individually
Part 4 - Students are able to complete the assessment
I found this strategy one of the most effective. By starting with breaking down what questions are asking and what answers look like and slowly building independence students were able to see more clearly what was expected of them. I believe that this strategy and the authentic learning environment of snow camp helped to create the high grades achieved by the students.

The checklist strategy was starting to become effective but too late in the year. Only got the the point where I was creating checklists for them to ensure they had completed with assessments and learning tasks, not co-constructing or them creating their own.

Certain strategies I trialled I felt weren't successful as I brought them in too late in the year, such as  as ask 3 before me and checklists. I was trying to get students into these habits in Term Three. I feel like if I had brought them in earlier on in the year and set them up as a part of the classroom culture and expectations that they would have been more successful.


So what did I learn throughout my inquiry?

As my inquiry tracked along I found that I was already using a lot of strategies in the class that I was unaware of. In short some worked and others didn't. I learnt that by instilling these strategies as expectations and making sure they were very clear and consistent helped to create greater success. This is something I know I personally need to work on.
I believe overall it would have been more effective using these strategies from the start of the year and building them into the culture of the class as a expectations. I believe that it was harder trying to start half way through the year when students already had set ideas of these expectations.

Where to from here?

I really enjoyed this inquiry and felt a sense of achievement seeing it start to pay off in the classroom. Because of that I am going to ensure that I continue this inquiry next year with my IGCSE class. By learning from past mistakes and starting right from the first class I am hoping that the results will be more effective.

9/11: Reflection on 2017 - Level 2

Reflection on 2017 - Level 2

9th November 2017

Now that the seniors have gone it's time to reflect back on the year that has been, in particular what went well and what needs to be improved. Teachers of Level 2 have already sat down to analyse our results and data from 2017 by standard. This is more of a personal reflection of 2017 with my Level 2 students. I will start by doing my own personal review of each standard before adding any other comments.

2.4 - Perform a physical activity in an applied setting

What went well? Why?

• Nice way to start the year – great way to build class relationships

• Video from Sport Waitakere with explanation of rules was a nice, simple way to allow students to learn the rules – could have put the link to this on Schoolbox so students had access to this

• Broke down assessment criteria of what A, M & E looks like

• By completing this standard first students also got the idea that their year of Physical Education would be more practical

• Although I broke down criteria with the students I didn’t go in enough depth for Ki-O-Rahi specifically – could have done this and got students to self-assess themselves against this criteria before starting to help increase knowledge of game play. Students may then be able to create links to other invasion games they have played before and identify how they can transfer their skills

• Could have gone into more depth around the traditions of the game to help increase understanding

• Students were either on par with their self assessment marking or marking generously. I could have got students to assess themselves more often and had more detailed checkpoints in which I could have provided students with feedback and where I currently see them to help with the disparity and help to improve grades

• Anatomy displayed the greatest depth of knowledge across all students and this reflected through to the assessment – students think creating videos around each joint helped with this

• Identified priority learners, sought support from Housemasters, mentors & parents/guardians. However this quite close to the due date of the assessment as I was struggling to differentiate who was being lazy and leaving it to the last minute and who was struggling with content and needed extra support

• Plenty of teaching time available - planning and time management of lessons = great

• Used a variety of teaching methods e.g. group work, collaboration, expert groups, practicals, worksheets, note taking, practise paragraphs, breaking down of paragraph structure. This was to see what students responded to best and to try and suit the needs of my learners and their individual learning styles in which they identified at the start of the year

• Assessment needs to be changed – quite repetitive even though it just serves as a reminder

• Could have actually introduced a mini performance improvement practical section to help create an authentic learning environment and allow deeper understanding of skill acquisition

• Some students really struggled with this being the first written assessment. It also has the most content knowledge – especially if new to PE. This could be changed by possibly moving it later on in the year. Also hoping to see a difference in 2018's L2s as they will be the first to have completed the new Junior PE programme which prepares them for success at senior level

• Had already identified priority learners and those who need extra motivation in first written assessment so knew who I had to keep an eye on

• The use of checkpoints and due dates throughout the assessment worked well. It was easy to identify those struggling or behind and put strategies in place to ensure they met these e.g. missed deadline could result in no practical lesson when planned, spending time doing their work during lunch or after school, DTs etc.

• The use of checkpoints and having already identified priority learners meant that I was easily able to create a network of support around students earlier by involving parents & Housemasters

• Used results from student voice at the end of 2.2, especially in regards to learning activities and teaching styles and ensured to use the preferred learning styles across this assessment

• Although I had a set plan of how the unit may look I was able to be flexible and adapt so the programme could best suit the needs of my students e.g. more teacher led training sessions with group evaluations compared to student training sessions or moving practicals out of period 5 since there wasn't enough time to complete an adequate training session

• In regards to the training programme I ensured to complete a teacher led training programme as an example. We then broke this down and evaluated it as a class. Students could then also draw links and relevance to assessment task evaluation. I also used the teacher led training programmes to help create variety and complete different forms of training that I would not expect students to choose for themselves

• My planning in regards to session layout could have been completed better e.g. not having student training sessions in period 5 where it is a short period. However, realised this throughout the programme and was able to adapt this as I went

• Some students struggled with definitions of certain principles. I wonder if I could have created a more interesting & effective way of getting this information across. Also independent students made note of these as we went through these in class and others did not

• Students loved the authentic learning environment of snow camp. This reflected through to the specific examples students were able to provide throughout their assessment, resulting in our best results out of all the written standards

• A lot of the lessons allowed students to learn practically resulting in higher levels of understanding of content

• I could tell I had a great understanding of the content along with the students. I felt like my questioning had improved greatly and I was able to get students thinking about different aspects and guide them to certain points through the use of my questioning. This was also particular and relevant when one of the students was injured and unable to attend camp and instead wrote about a previous experience. She still gained an Excellence as she sought the extra help to ensure her level of understanding was correct

• In some ways the amount of time allocated for the learning based around 2.7 was too long. Some students were feeling bored especially in regards to content and terminology. When reflecting on my own lessons some started to get repetitive as I tried to use different contexts to get the same points across. I could have sought help in how I could have created more variation

• There was talk of doing a mini run through of the assessment by doing a practical activity off site such as rock climbing. This was unable to happen but sounds like a cool idea

• Students had the choice of 5 topics. If they wanted to do another topic out of these 5 they could have indicated their interest and had this approved

• Broke down assessment criteria especially what was needed for A, M & E when introducing them to the standard

• In lessons where students were working independently on there assessment I had a couple of lessons in which I was able to go around the class and talk individually to each and every single student as to how they were progressing in there assessment. This included giving students the chance to ask questions, for mer to read some of their work and give feedback, as well as also asking them questions to help lead them to further points they could include. I found that this was the most effective form of help for the students

• Students struggled with motivation being the end of term 3 - unsure if there is anything extra I could have done to help encourage students/make lessons more interesting

• Felt put off that there wasn’t a big teaching & learning process unlike past assessments so felt like they were thrown in the deep end & was there first socio-cultural assessment asking them to think critically (didn’t help I was out for a week on tournament week)

• First time for me teaching a critical thinking assessment so I think my questioning process could have been better

• I made the decision to start the year with a week of ABL activities. I noticed in the first class that I met them that they were very awkward and there was a large segregation between boys and girls as well as old vs new students.  I made this decision to get the class to work together before them completing their first assessment and feel like it was the right one

• Used student voice multiple times with this class especially in regards to learning activities and my teaching style. I always made sure to respond to this student feedback - whether this was summarising the results to the class, explaining the reason behind activities in relation to results etc. 

• I feel I could have potentially shared some more information about myself with my students to quick start some of the relationship building. I feel like the reason I may not have done this as well is because I had already taught half of the students

• I feel like a lot of my lesson's could have been differentiated more e.g. different forms of the same activity for different levels of understanding. Most of my lessons were aimed towards the mid to low end of the class which could have resulted in some boredom in the class

• I think I should have taught students some more in regards to giving feedback and constructive criticism. Their feedback wasn't always specific or useful when collecting student voice. E.g. they would infer something needed to change but not state what could have been done differently

• I'm not sure that the use of the different google folders for students is the most effective form of note taking, although it is nice easy access to be able to see student work. Could possibly look into this and try an alternative method next year?

• I think I need to be more effective and efficient to regards to standards. Sometimes I set my high standards and students make me feel like they are too high and too hard to be met so I can find myself lowering them

• I didn't always break down the standard with students at the being of the assessment. This sometimes resulted in students being unsure of the importance of certain aspects to then click when they see the standard. However, sometimes the risk in doing this is teaching to the assessment

What could have been improved? Why?

2.2 - Demonstrate understanding of how and why biophysical principles relate to the learning of physical skills

What went well? Why?

What could have been improved? Why?

2.3 - Demonstrate understanding of the application of biophysical principles to training for physical activity

What went well? Why?

What could have been improved? Why?

2.7 - Analyse the application of risk management strategies to a challenging outdoor activity

What went well? Why?

What could have been improved? Why?

2.5 - Examine the significance for self, others and society of a sporting event, a physical activity, or a festival

What went well? Why?

What could have been improved? Why?

Other comments

What went well? Why?

What could have been improved? Why?

28/8: PD - Student Advisory Panel

PD: Student Advisory Panel

28th August 2017

As a part of today's Staff PD we had a group of students from various year levels who are members of our Student Advisory Panel present to us. After students from Kaipara College came and presented on what student led initiatives they were running throughout their school, staff and students alike were inspired to start here at King's College. As a result a Student Advisory Panel was created and approached one of our Senior Leadership staff to come and talk to staff about Student-Teacher Relationships. Throughout this presentation students covered the importance of; getting to know your students, feeling comfortable enough to ask questions,  getting to know your teacher on a more personal level, rapport in the classroom & staff participation in school or house activities.

Hotene started by giving us some background as to how the Student Advisory Panel was formed, who is represented and their inspiration. After the creation of the Panel they decided to discuss things that they all valued and what messages they wanted to portray. Key points that were highlighted were; students knowing that any mistake is fixable, feeling comfortable to ask for help and knowing teachers will approach you if you are stuck. He then introduced the students who would be speaking in today's session and what topics they will be addressing.


Importance of getting to know your students

• Students who learnt more felt more comfortable in their environment
• 4 main results due to having a student-teacher relationship:
• academic success
• less behaviour management by developing a relationship with disruptive students as no student wants to fail, instead you just need to find out what makes them click 
• development of self worth
• more productive environment
• How to develop:
• knowledge of names & pronunciation, ethnicity/cultural background, day student vs boarder
• Showing interest in students life outside of school - how was your day/weekend?
• Students felt that a stronger relationship with teacher resulted in better classroom environment, homework handed in on time and students felt they listened more in class

The importance of feeling comfortable to ask questions

• This particular Year 11 student felt like since she was new to the College that she wasn't up to speed. She included that she felt behind in regards to relationships with teachers and other students & teaching styles and platforms. This resulted in her feeling left behind and judged for having to ask questions
• She explained that since she was new people were more lenient in regards to certain aspects of school life such as handing in homework was late. This made her feel confused as she liked the extra help but also felt it was unfair that it was not being offered to the whole class and felt uncomfortable about her special treatment
• Another key message of hers was he importance of being open to allow all students to ask questions. E.g. don't single out new students, expect questions from everyone and specify when extra help is available outside of class (can students email, ask for help, have extra time, extra sessions etc.)

The importance of knowing your teacher on a more personal level

• This speaker addressed the importance of his teachers opening up about their personal life as he feels that he is able to develop more respect for his teachers and sees them as more of a mentor in their life
• Although stories may not be relevant to what they are learning they helped develop respect
• Sharing information about themselves on the first day helps to break the ice and show that we are all human
• Using personal experiences to help show practical examples
• Spending one on one time with students - sharing personal information/connection with students to help them through

The importance of rapport in the classroom

• Strengthen general collective respect for the teacher, individual rapport through conversations, have an environment in which
• Finding a common ground, maintaining eye contact throughout conversations

The importance of teacher participation in house/school activities

• Teacher involvement in school activities such as swimming sports & athletics
• Teachers showing interest in student lives outside of class

The idea is not to tell us what to teach, since we already know that but they are showing us how they like to learn

The aim of this session was for students to feel valued and get there points and feelings across on certain points. They stressed the importance that this session was not for them to tell us what to teach them as we know better. Rather, they were hoping to show us how they like to learn and feel in the classroom.

Some points really stood out from this session for me. An example is the idea that the more you give of yourself to your students, the more you are likely to receive back from them. I also liked the reminder that no student likes to be seen as disruptive or naughty and they don't purposely fail. Instead it is our job to try and connect with our students, to build a relationship and find the style of learning that works best for them.

Link to blog post regarding Student Agency from Kaipara College students found here.

19/7: Reflection - National PENZ Conference - Past, Present, Future

Reflection: National PENZ Conference - Past, Present, Future

19th July

From 10th - 12th July I was down at Papamoa College attending the National PENZ conference. The conference is made from a wide range of educators, from Primary to Tertiary, along with other external providers from the 3 key organisations of Physical Education New Zealand, Education Outdoors New Zealand & Health Education Association New Zealand. This year's theme was around celebrating the past, understanding the present and looking forward into the future. 

Across the 3 days I was able to attend a variety of sessions, present my own session with Georgia & continue creating many new connections. Like last year, I had many great takeways from conference and hope to share some of my highlights.

The conference started off with 3 key note speakers - Professor Ian Culpan to represent the past, Cameron Smith to represent the present & Helen Tuhoro to represent the future. These 3 speakers were a great way of captivating the theme right from the start of conference and are my first highlight. 

Ian is one of the creators of our current New Zealand Curriculum document. He emphasized he would be to trying to address the influences of what is happening in our learning area. This started with the idea of HPE being the hostage of politics, ideologies and cultural concepts through key themes of controlling and discipling the human body and normalisation of behaviour. However, he wanted to remind us that HPE is a learning area based around humanism and the development of people. Throughout his Keynote Ian got us thinking about how we ensure we challenge these 'norms' we are faced with everyday.

Cameron's key theme was putting the emphasis in the value of Physical Education not physical outcomes. He got me to reflect on what the role of a Physical Education teacher is, ensuring that we are putting the learning and sociocultural thought at the forefront of our subject and whether we are doing enough in our junior curriculum to cultivate critical thinking. He also gave fun practical examples of how our students could learn, in, through and about movement rather than through theories in a classroom. One example was how Deb Robertson is trying to get away from formal standardized assessments, so is instead getting her students to reflect throughout the units.

Helen finished off by inspiring us all through Tarawera's journey. Helen spoke about the importance of relationships and giving students hope. To do so at Tarawera three things needed to change; the people, the environment & the curriculum. This involved the creation of the MANA (Manakitanga, Ako, Ngāku-pono & Āwhina) acronym and asking the questions of what are we here for, what do we want from them and how are we going to do it? Key points that I am going to take away is ensuring that my students see the point in every learning activity and where it is taking them in the bigger picture. Key quotes I am also going to take into my practice include:

• "Great teachers engineer great learning that put the students in the driver's seat"
• "The first step to raising achievement is by raising engagement"
• "If it is not tough and doesn't challenge you it won't change you"

Tracey Clelland along with Rachael Dixon & Jenny Robertson's presentations also stood out to me. I decided to go to these as I am currently trying to rewrite the Year 9 Health programme. Tracey's presentation was around building resilience. She gave us some activities that we can take into our classes to get students to truly think about who they are through using 'the power of vulnerability' and how we can put the '5 Ways to Wellbeing' in action not only within our classes but our own communities. Rachael & Jenny's was around teaching and learning activity ideas around the topic of Alcohol & Drugs. This 90 minute session gave us ideas on what we may want in the unit and activities that can allow us to challenge our students thinking. These activities included; continuums, scenarios, identifying influences & PIPS. Look out for a future blog post to see how my unit planning is going and how I have used these ideas. 

Another highlight was Sara Hayward's 'Engaging the disengaged' presentation. This session stood out to me as it closely links through to my inquiry for the year of how to create independent learners.  Sara's improvements were made over 3 years with the same cohort. These findings were inspiring and being able to talk to others in the session helped me to brainstorm new ideas. Not only was I able to pick up on some new ideas, but it also allowed me to acknowledge that I have been on the right track in what I have currently been doing and that maybe all I need is extra time. Keep an eye out for a future blog post on specifics that I took from Sara's presentation and how it has helped my 2017 inquiry. 

Other highlights included Lesley Park & Alison Schofields presentation on troubles with marking and moderation surrounding Level 2, Mike King's closing Keynote and presenting my first ever PENZ presentation with Georgia on our BT Journey and the part Twitter has played (see her post on this here). Georgia and I also won a prize for our costume (pictured below) and of course we were both humbled when we were awarded with the PENZ award of Outstanding New Professionals!

Overall it was another successful conference in which I am walking away with new ideas and inspiration, new connections and having finally met other educators that I have been previously connecting with!

6/6 - PD: Student Agency

Staff PD: Student Agency

6th June 2017

For our Staff PD session today we had two students and a teacher from Kaipara College talk to us about their recent journey to include student agency within their school. They started a student agency group for Maori students with the key idea of being culturally responsive. They started with a student agency day to discuss what this would look like. What is it? What do they want to achieve? When they will meet? Key themes of what student agency in action would look like are:

• building relationships
• group work
• controlled but fair environment
• humor
• positivity
• fair work pace - not too fast
• having activities that allow students to move

Students organized a Whanau evening. They sent letters to family so they could come in and learn about NCEA. What is it? What are credits? How do you pass level 1, 2 & 3? The evening was fully ran by students. They also included a session based off Kamar results. 

They then held a PD Day for staff. There were multiple sessions which included:

• deficit theorizing
• this was confronting & uncomfortable for some teachers as they gave examples such as  a teacher growling a student for not having a pen even though they had pens on there desk, a student was missing for 2 weeks - didn't ask where they were and they had been attending a funeral
• Amazing Race for staff where they were graded A, M & E
• Whanau evening #2 - rang parents rather than letters, greater success
• Awards evening/success assembly - PRIDE awards, Ruben Wiki also attended, students MCed the night

They continued their journey this year and just last week completed their first Whanau evening for 2017. They rang parents again as well as sending emails.  They found the phone calls were more effective & drew in more parents. This night included 5 Pods, ran by students, and made sure to include upcoming events at school.

So how has implementing a student agency program implemented staff & students? Some examples of how they have been going are below:

• students interviewed teachers from different facilities to provide a range of different voices. They were asked what effects and impacts have worked for them:
• increased relationships including greater respect & partnerships
• helped gain extra knowledge & Maori students were more engaged
• cultural language = more involvement
• impacts on students included:
• Maori are more engaged and participating in class
• students personal excellence was being acknowledged even if that was even just an Achieved or Merit
• Interview with the Principal
• Why did you let the group happen? - stepping back from leadership to allow students to have more of a voice, in turn parents became more involved after seeing the development
• Effects of staff - teachers were more open to change. They sometimes knew that change was needed but they were unsure of how this would happen

So a key question is where do you even start on a journey like this?

Kaipara College started by addressing the needs of the students. It is vital to make sure students have the biggest voice, because after all it is all about them. They then ensured they focussed on pedagogical development. This was mainly through co constructing holistic strategies with both students and staff. This included what does it look like and how is it visible? They did acknowledge that having a new principal and faculty leaders may have helped to have created more momentum for change.

This PD session left me feeling inspired. It reminded me that although I may not be able to change everything in the school, I can at least ensure ALL of my students feel included and valued within my classroom. 

1/5: PD - Term 2 Staff PD

PD - Term 2 Staff PD

1st May 2017

Today's Staff PD was based around the idea of inquiry and appraisal. For a lot of staff the idea of inquiry was new last year and this is the first year that the school has built up an appraisal system, through the use of the Interlead system. The aim for using Interlead is that staff will be able to complete their inquiry and appraisal in the same place, while collecting a portfolio of evidence for PTC criteria. 

The day started with Judith, from Interlead, coming in and introducing the system to the staff as a whole. Before jumping straight into the basics she went through some key points as to why inquiry and appraisal are important. 

Interlead was created to be "a tool for growth"by intrinsically motivating yourself to improve rather than being told. It was based off a book called 'An everyone culture'. Judith also covered Professional Capital and the 3 parts it is split into:

1. Human Capital - the talent of the individual teacher comprising their knowledge, skills & ability
2. Social Capital - the ability of the teacher to learn with and through their professional relationship
3. Decisional Capital - the wisdom and expertise of the teacher to make sound judgements about learners (cultivated over many years)

She used this diagram of Tātaiako to explain certain points of inquiry and appraisal. An example is the accountability circle - self assessing around the King's Pillars in our appraisal questionnaire to create goals. She also said that due to us as teachers having more data is means that we will be able to lead the discussion with our appraiser in terms of how we are tracking and our needs. This could include you setting the scene and telling our appraiser how we want to be appraised. Whether you want an appraiser who is appreciate (which is 96% of NZ teachers), evaluative (gather data and observe for about 5 mins and then give the data back), a coach or a mentor who is good in the area that you want to improve on.

She also compared teaching as inquiry to coming 'upstream'. Important questions could include:

• What are you doing & changing? 
• Why are you getting the results that you are?

Judith explained how judgements are dangerous and gave some examples of how we may want to improve our own practice. These included:

• observing others to learn
• getting others to observe you in areas that you want to learn
• how can be open up to receive open & honest feedback
• final evaluation at the end/completion 

So what is the difference between an inquiry & a goal? An inquiry can also be known as "action research" as we research the unknown. Goals are the completion or the 'destination' and could be dependent on a school target for you and your department. Judith recommended setting goals & inquiries in the 'Health Anxiety' zone as we can then push ourselves outside of our own comfort zones.

When writing a new inquiry/goal make sure to write a question and end with a goal. This helps you to envisage the destination or end point. Then ask yourself 'what steps do I need to take'? Possible steps could include:

1. Collect student voice as much as possible and then taking their voice back to them to see how they want you to improve
2. Relevant research/professional readings
3. Visit other teachers
4. Invite someone to observe my practice
5. Get feedback 
6. Engage in professional conversations with a coach/mentor

Remember: "It's not about the person giving you the feedback, it's about how you react to the feedback"

She recommended the book 'Thinking fast and slow' by Daniel Kahneman. Judith explained how it gets inside the teacher's head where we have a fast brain and a slow brain. A fast brain is based on intuition & instinct (school's are a fast brain place). The slow brain is based on evaluating, analyzing, planning, reflecting & inquiring.

For the next part of the day we moved into department time. This time was allocated for us to focus on appraisal & inquiry. Our departments aim was to brainstorm possible inquiry ideas and then look at how we might go about some of them or why. Here is my brainstorm of possible inquiry topics:

• 21st century competences
• Visible learning
• Culturally Responsive Pedagogy
• Higher order thinking
• Literacy/language of learning
• Self regulated learners/creating independent learners

Unfortunately we didn't get to spend too much time on this as a department so hopefully this will be too be continued.

20/4: Reflection - The Power of Twitter

Reflection: The Power of Twitter

20th April 2017

Today was a really showed the power of Twitter and how great it can be for networking and professional development.

After waking up this morning I was lying in bed scrolling through Twitter. I came across a post about #ohedchat and that they were having a chat based around partnership. Since I have been putting extra effort into building three-way partnerships I thought what a great chat to try and involve myself in. After figuring out that 9pm EST was 1pm NZST I set a reminder and got on with my day.

My reminder went off (thankfully otherwise it would have slipped my mind!) and I got comfy to start participating in #ohedchat. The chat started and it was cool to see people over in the States introducing themselves. It was obvious that a lot of them must be regulars in the chat but I felt welcomed in as a newbie. I spent the next hour networking, connecting and discussing with others in the same profession just on the other side of the world. 

Key points covered in the chat included:

• why partnerships are important
• why & how students and teachers can and should learn together
• how students can lead their own learning that involves the community
• what factors can harm partnerships and how can they be avoided

What what did I leave the chat with? Not only did I pick up on interesting opinions and ideas surrounding partnerships, I also recognized the importance of community in these partnerships. Although I have increased my partnerships and relationships with students, parents and housemasters I have not really included the wider community. This inclusiveness of the wider community was a strong theme throughout the chat as well as the idea of schools supporting and giving back. I also was able to share small parts of NZ through the chat such as introducing the term of ākonga to others on the other side of the world. 

Overall it was great to be able to participate in a new chat with others that I wouldn't normally get to chat to because of different time zones. I was able to takeaway some tips and widen my connections.

Now that my friends is a snippet of the power of Twitter!

My Storify of the chat can be seen here. 

8/3: Reflection - PRT Meeting #1

Reflection: PRT Meeting #1 of 2017

8th March 2017

Today was the first chance to meet with Melissa in regards to the PRT program. We have both identified that as a second year my needs are slightly different to a first year. As I am the only second year teacher in the school I am having individual meetings with her rather than joining in with the first years. We have also acknowledged that there will be certain times in which I could be an asset to the first years and provide some of my own advice or knowledge from my experience as a first year.

In todays meeting it gave us the opportunity to chat about the following; this year’s inquiry, last year’s inquiry, stress management and goals for the year.

Currently my idea for this year’s inquiry is to get my Level 2 Class to become more independent with their learning. Throughout the term I have felt like I am trying to pull them through their assessments and theory work. I am aiming to find a way to ensure they feel more responsible for their own progress and learning so I don’t feel like I am chasing them for not having done their work all the time. As to how I am going to do this - I’m not entirely sure yet. However she gave me some pointers on trying to connect my inquiry to things such as the school's strategic goals and pedagogical model, 21st century skills and other components from my inquiry last year & key competencies. 

In regards to last year’s inquiry Melissa was interested to find out what my focus was, what key areas where and the evidence that I collected. We discussed different aspects I looked into in terms of building classroom rapport such as culturally responsive pedagogy.  She said it was a great inquiry for a first year teacher and that I need to ensure all my evidence is collated onto my blog.

As for stress management Melissa asked me to recall times when I felt stressed as a first year. I was then to compare them to how I have felt in those situations this year and to try and identify new challenges I have noticed this year. As we had so much to cover in our meeting she suggested I work through the pages in my Induction & Mentoring Programme Year 2 booklet so we can discuss the things I identify in our next meeting. These activities include:

• time management e.g. what takes up my time (tasks and time wasters)
• stress management - causes & relievers
• impact on wellbeing
• extended support

And lastly we discussed some of my goals for the year. I informed Melissa of my main goals for the year which are becoming more confident on my iPad, greater parent contact and ensuring I continue to put relationships first. we spoke briefly as to why I choose these goals and then talked more about the parent contact. I told Melissa about improvements I could have made in regards to parent contact such as getting in touch with parents after interviews to give them an update on their child or to ensure I give parents warning before getting in contact with them about their child failing an assessment. Melissa agreed and also emphasized the need for checkpoints. She suggested as many as possible to help keep track of student progress. She also suggested that by sharing these check points with parents and keeping them up to date with how their child is tracking it will help to minimize surprises if they do not do so well and can increase support from home. 

Overall I thought it was a great opportunity to sit down and discuss multiple topics with Melissa and it was exciting to see the outline she has created for the year. It was also nice to know I had some direction as to where our next meeting would be going and some things to do before that meeting.

17/2: Reflection - BLENNZ Meeting

Reflection: BLENNZ Meeting

17th February 2017

Today at lunch we were lucky enough to have a member of the Blind and Low Vision Education Network NZ (BLENNZ) come in and talk to us. This year we have a student in Year 9 with Oculocutaneous Albinism. The school and BLENNZ meet his teachers to discuss what this meant, learning challenges and how we can help him to overcome them.

Oculocutaneous Albinism means that this student has a lack of pigmentation in his hair and skin and it effects his eyes. The fovea (pit at the back of the retina responsible for sharp vision) is affected and this particular student has a vision ranging from 6/36 - 6/60 (the "normal/average" vision is 6/6. We were told that he can fluctuate depending on the level of tiredness, stress of hunger he is experiencing.

As his vision is impaired it can challenge his learning. Examples could be; struggling to navigate school especially when busy, not being able to see written work well without the use of technology, could struggle in situations such as sports/ games when a ball could be moving fast.

So as his teachers what can we do to help?

• use digital format so he is able to enlarge the screen/text
• may need extra verbalization of tasks e.g. not practical/visual demonstrations of work
• be conscious of glare on whiteboards/desktops
• use blue or black markers on whiteboards rather than red or green
• use black and white or blue and yellow on data projection
• consider everyday language of over there etc and try and give directions in more detail
• if watching video clips in class send the link to him prior to the class or after so he can review it

Personally I think a meeting like this proved valuable. I can now actually understand his condition and what his vision is like. I can now take this information into consideration when planning lessons for the class. I can consider if I need to modify lessons to better suit his needs and ensure that he is still included in all activities. 

A handout from today's session with more information on Hugo's condition can be found here.

8/2: Reflection - 12 PE Progress

12 PE Progress

8th February 2017

This year is my first time teaching Level 2 Physical Education and I was excited to see a lot of familiar faces from Core PE last year. Going along to my first lesson I thought that this class would be the easiest to form relationships with, having taught most of them before. Although I have a good relationship with most of the students in the class I noticed in my first lesson that they were rather awkward with each other.

Our first lesson was only 20 minutes long due to a '6 period morning'. I decided to use this time to learn more about my students and for them to learn more about each other. I decided to start off with an activity called Connections that I learnt on a PD course last year. This activity starts with someone sharing information about themselves. They choose what they are willing to share. While sharing they aim to make a connection with someone else in the room. When a connection is made that person says "I can connect with that". They then explain the connection, introduce themselves and share something new about themselves.

I have used this connection activity a few times with different classes and it has always worked really well, but this time it was just plain awkward.  No matter what question I asked the 12 PE class, in or out of the connections activity they were very reluctant to share in front of each other. The time they seemed most comfortable was when they were talking in their small friend groups.

Since that lesson we have spent 4 lessons completing a variety of ABL activities. The purpose of these activities were aiming to loosen them up and get them communicating with each other. Pictures and examples of those ABL activities are below:

Leap Frog 

Hidden Pathway

River Crossing

The way they were awkward in class, with the boys and girls keeping to themselves, I was worried about our first assessment of the year, 2.4 (Ki-O-Rahi). Even throughout the first couple of lessons of ABL activities the girls would work with each other and so would the boys. I trying to help them grow their confidence levels and start working together in a range of contexts.

By the end of our 4th lesson I was really proud with the progress the class had made. They were more open to communicating with each other and were working together better as a class. Even the segregation between the boys and girls was slowly disappearing. Fingers crossed that this improvement continues and the class keeps blossoming!