9/11: Reflection on 2017 - Level 2

Reflection on 2017 - Level 2

9th November 2017

Now that the seniors have gone it's time to reflect back on the year that has been, in particular what went well and what needs to be improved. Teachers of Level 2 have already sat down to analyse our results and data from 2017 by standard. This is more of a personal reflection of 2017 with my Level 2 students. I will start by doing my own personal review of each standard before adding any other comments.

2.4 - Perform a physical activity in an applied setting

What went well? Why?

• Nice way to start the year – great way to build class relationships

• Video from Sport Waitakere with explanation of rules was a nice, simple way to allow students to learn the rules – could have put the link to this on Schoolbox so students had access to this

• Broke down assessment criteria of what A, M & E looks like

• By completing this standard first students also got the idea that their year of Physical Education would be more practical

• Although I broke down criteria with the students I didn’t go in enough depth for Ki-O-Rahi specifically – could have done this and got students to self-assess themselves against this criteria before starting to help increase knowledge of game play. Students may then be able to create links to other invasion games they have played before and identify how they can transfer their skills

• Could have gone into more depth around the traditions of the game to help increase understanding

• Students were either on par with their self assessment marking or marking generously. I could have got students to assess themselves more often and had more detailed checkpoints in which I could have provided students with feedback and where I currently see them to help with the disparity and help to improve grades

• Anatomy displayed the greatest depth of knowledge across all students and this reflected through to the assessment – students think creating videos around each joint helped with this

• Identified priority learners, sought support from Housemasters, mentors & parents/guardians. However this quite close to the due date of the assessment as I was struggling to differentiate who was being lazy and leaving it to the last minute and who was struggling with content and needed extra support

• Plenty of teaching time available - planning and time management of lessons = great

• Used a variety of teaching methods e.g. group work, collaboration, expert groups, practicals, worksheets, note taking, practise paragraphs, breaking down of paragraph structure. This was to see what students responded to best and to try and suit the needs of my learners and their individual learning styles in which they identified at the start of the year

• Assessment needs to be changed – quite repetitive even though it just serves as a reminder

• Could have actually introduced a mini performance improvement practical section to help create an authentic learning environment and allow deeper understanding of skill acquisition

• Some students really struggled with this being the first written assessment. It also has the most content knowledge – especially if new to PE. This could be changed by possibly moving it later on in the year. Also hoping to see a difference in 2018's L2s as they will be the first to have completed the new Junior PE programme which prepares them for success at senior level

• Had already identified priority learners and those who need extra motivation in first written assessment so knew who I had to keep an eye on

• The use of checkpoints and due dates throughout the assessment worked well. It was easy to identify those struggling or behind and put strategies in place to ensure they met these e.g. missed deadline could result in no practical lesson when planned, spending time doing their work during lunch or after school, DTs etc.

• The use of checkpoints and having already identified priority learners meant that I was easily able to create a network of support around students earlier by involving parents & Housemasters

• Used results from student voice at the end of 2.2, especially in regards to learning activities and teaching styles and ensured to use the preferred learning styles across this assessment

• Although I had a set plan of how the unit may look I was able to be flexible and adapt so the programme could best suit the needs of my students e.g. more teacher led training sessions with group evaluations compared to student training sessions or moving practicals out of period 5 since there wasn't enough time to complete an adequate training session

• In regards to the training programme I ensured to complete a teacher led training programme as an example. We then broke this down and evaluated it as a class. Students could then also draw links and relevance to assessment task evaluation. I also used the teacher led training programmes to help create variety and complete different forms of training that I would not expect students to choose for themselves

• My planning in regards to session layout could have been completed better e.g. not having student training sessions in period 5 where it is a short period. However, realised this throughout the programme and was able to adapt this as I went

• Some students struggled with definitions of certain principles. I wonder if I could have created a more interesting & effective way of getting this information across. Also independent students made note of these as we went through these in class and others did not

• Students loved the authentic learning environment of snow camp. This reflected through to the specific examples students were able to provide throughout their assessment, resulting in our best results out of all the written standards

• A lot of the lessons allowed students to learn practically resulting in higher levels of understanding of content

• I could tell I had a great understanding of the content along with the students. I felt like my questioning had improved greatly and I was able to get students thinking about different aspects and guide them to certain points through the use of my questioning. This was also particular and relevant when one of the students was injured and unable to attend camp and instead wrote about a previous experience. She still gained an Excellence as she sought the extra help to ensure her level of understanding was correct

• In some ways the amount of time allocated for the learning based around 2.7 was too long. Some students were feeling bored especially in regards to content and terminology. When reflecting on my own lessons some started to get repetitive as I tried to use different contexts to get the same points across. I could have sought help in how I could have created more variation

• There was talk of doing a mini run through of the assessment by doing a practical activity off site such as rock climbing. This was unable to happen but sounds like a cool idea

• Students had the choice of 5 topics. If they wanted to do another topic out of these 5 they could have indicated their interest and had this approved

• Broke down assessment criteria especially what was needed for A, M & E when introducing them to the standard

• In lessons where students were working independently on there assessment I had a couple of lessons in which I was able to go around the class and talk individually to each and every single student as to how they were progressing in there assessment. This included giving students the chance to ask questions, for mer to read some of their work and give feedback, as well as also asking them questions to help lead them to further points they could include. I found that this was the most effective form of help for the students

• Students struggled with motivation being the end of term 3 - unsure if there is anything extra I could have done to help encourage students/make lessons more interesting

• Felt put off that there wasn’t a big teaching & learning process unlike past assessments so felt like they were thrown in the deep end & was there first socio-cultural assessment asking them to think critically (didn’t help I was out for a week on tournament week)

• First time for me teaching a critical thinking assessment so I think my questioning process could have been better

• I made the decision to start the year with a week of ABL activities. I noticed in the first class that I met them that they were very awkward and there was a large segregation between boys and girls as well as old vs new students.  I made this decision to get the class to work together before them completing their first assessment and feel like it was the right one

• Used student voice multiple times with this class especially in regards to learning activities and my teaching style. I always made sure to respond to this student feedback - whether this was summarising the results to the class, explaining the reason behind activities in relation to results etc. 

• I feel I could have potentially shared some more information about myself with my students to quick start some of the relationship building. I feel like the reason I may not have done this as well is because I had already taught half of the students

• I feel like a lot of my lesson's could have been differentiated more e.g. different forms of the same activity for different levels of understanding. Most of my lessons were aimed towards the mid to low end of the class which could have resulted in some boredom in the class

• I think I should have taught students some more in regards to giving feedback and constructive criticism. Their feedback wasn't always specific or useful when collecting student voice. E.g. they would infer something needed to change but not state what could have been done differently

• I'm not sure that the use of the different google folders for students is the most effective form of note taking, although it is nice easy access to be able to see student work. Could possibly look into this and try an alternative method next year?

• I think I need to be more effective and efficient to regards to standards. Sometimes I set my high standards and students make me feel like they are too high and too hard to be met so I can find myself lowering them

• I didn't always break down the standard with students at the being of the assessment. This sometimes resulted in students being unsure of the importance of certain aspects to then click when they see the standard. However, sometimes the risk in doing this is teaching to the assessment

What could have been improved? Why?

2.2 - Demonstrate understanding of how and why biophysical principles relate to the learning of physical skills

What went well? Why?

What could have been improved? Why?

2.3 - Demonstrate understanding of the application of biophysical principles to training for physical activity

What went well? Why?

What could have been improved? Why?

2.7 - Analyse the application of risk management strategies to a challenging outdoor activity

What went well? Why?

What could have been improved? Why?

2.5 - Examine the significance for self, others and society of a sporting event, a physical activity, or a festival

What went well? Why?

What could have been improved? Why?

Other comments

What went well? Why?

What could have been improved? Why?

6/6 - PD: Student Agency

Staff PD: Student Agency

6th June 2017

For our Staff PD session today we had two students and a teacher from Kaipara College talk to us about their recent journey to include student agency within their school. They started a student agency group for Maori students with the key idea of being culturally responsive. They started with a student agency day to discuss what this would look like. What is it? What do they want to achieve? When they will meet? Key themes of what student agency in action would look like are:

• building relationships
• group work
• controlled but fair environment
• humor
• positivity
• fair work pace - not too fast
• having activities that allow students to move

Students organized a Whanau evening. They sent letters to family so they could come in and learn about NCEA. What is it? What are credits? How do you pass level 1, 2 & 3? The evening was fully ran by students. They also included a session based off Kamar results. 

They then held a PD Day for staff. There were multiple sessions which included:

• deficit theorizing
• this was confronting & uncomfortable for some teachers as they gave examples such as  a teacher growling a student for not having a pen even though they had pens on there desk, a student was missing for 2 weeks - didn't ask where they were and they had been attending a funeral
• Amazing Race for staff where they were graded A, M & E
• Whanau evening #2 - rang parents rather than letters, greater success
• Awards evening/success assembly - PRIDE awards, Ruben Wiki also attended, students MCed the night

They continued their journey this year and just last week completed their first Whanau evening for 2017. They rang parents again as well as sending emails.  They found the phone calls were more effective & drew in more parents. This night included 5 Pods, ran by students, and made sure to include upcoming events at school.

So how has implementing a student agency program implemented staff & students? Some examples of how they have been going are below:

• students interviewed teachers from different facilities to provide a range of different voices. They were asked what effects and impacts have worked for them:
• increased relationships including greater respect & partnerships
• helped gain extra knowledge & Maori students were more engaged
• cultural language = more involvement
• impacts on students included:
• Maori are more engaged and participating in class
• students personal excellence was being acknowledged even if that was even just an Achieved or Merit
• Interview with the Principal
• Why did you let the group happen? - stepping back from leadership to allow students to have more of a voice, in turn parents became more involved after seeing the development
• Effects of staff - teachers were more open to change. They sometimes knew that change was needed but they were unsure of how this would happen

So a key question is where do you even start on a journey like this?

Kaipara College started by addressing the needs of the students. It is vital to make sure students have the biggest voice, because after all it is all about them. They then ensured they focussed on pedagogical development. This was mainly through co constructing holistic strategies with both students and staff. This included what does it look like and how is it visible? They did acknowledge that having a new principal and faculty leaders may have helped to have created more momentum for change.

This PD session left me feeling inspired. It reminded me that although I may not be able to change everything in the school, I can at least ensure ALL of my students feel included and valued within my classroom. 

30/6: Health Reflections Pt 2

Year 11 Boys Health Reflections Pt 2

30th June 2016

After a few more attempts at creating effective Health lessons for my Year 11 boys class I asked for help from Alex.

Alex's Advice:

• Ensure that I am at the class before all students arrive. This then allows the 5 minute bell for me to write an outline of the learning activities, instructions and discussion questions up on the board before the students arrive
• As the second bell goes in which class is meant to start address the students with an instruction before they enter the class
• Make sure to spend time developing relationships with the kids e.g. greet every individual student as they enter the class, double check on instructions for those who might need clarification, little reminders such as phones away etc
• Don't use Health as a time to work on PE booklets - crossing between subjects can be confusing
• OVER PLAN - plan 4-5 different activities that only are about 5-10 minutes each. Can be structured; individual activity (3-4 mins), peer activity, group activity, class activity. By spending a short amount of time on each activity it stops students from getting bored

After a few lessons of following this procedure, especially the over planning, I have found them to be effective. Below are a few notes reflecting on the points above:

• I have found that due to having PE classes beforehand that I am not always able to make it up to the Health class before the 5 minute bell. This means that my notes aren't always up before the class arrives and I make sure to write these up while students are completing the first activity
• I have still been starting Health lessons with students completing their PE logs. They know that this is their 'Do Now' activity as soon as they enter the classroom and have become familiar with this routine. Students know this is always their first task in which they are able to listen to music etc. I make sure to use this time to chat to students about their work and finish writing up the lesson outline
• As student don't always arrive to class at the same time I allow students to enter when they get to the class. I make sure to acknowledge them and greet them as they enter
• I have found that planning lots of smaller activities have helped them to keep focussed and on task for longer

7/6: Health Reflection

Health Reflection - Year 11 Boys
7th June

After several different health classes with some of my Year 11 boys I am still trying to trial strategies to see how they best learn. To date I have mainly trialed group work and class discussion.

I first trialed group work as this is generally my first strategy when teaching health. I trialed this over 2 lessons while trying to recap the boys knowledge of Hauora (Lesson #1 LI: to recap students prior knowledge of Hauora & Lesson #2 LI: students are to reflect on what they believe health education is and start to learn how to challenge assumptions) - aspects of the first lesson flowed through to the second. Key finding from group work; boys of task majority of the time - although they were talking they were off topic, when they would share their groups answers they would share ideas just to get laughs out of other students, work took twice as long to complete - hence work from first lesson flowing through to second (this was also due to the introduction of reflective logs from PE as a do now & students being late to class).

After what felt like a couple of failed lessons Alex Smith came in and ran a health lesson with the boys. The lesson was composed of a continuum regarding the age of consent, a article in regards to lowering the age of consent and then revisiting the continuum. They were all based around class discussion. Overall the lesson ran really well. The boys were engaged with the lesson. I took some tips from Alex regarding classroom management e.g. reading of an article and then screens down, bringing up the idea of respect and listening to each other when sharing ideas.

The next lesson was also based on class discussion about consent. This started with a scenario and then class discussion was lead through a series of discussion questions. Although the class was a bit immature at times they were engaged and majority of the class was participating within discussions.

After continuing with the topic of consent with key focuses on legalities and local stories (as asked by the boys in our previous lesson) in the form of class discussions (which have been the most effective and engaging form of delivery so far) today's class was disruptive and unsettled. After leaving the class, especially with the last few lessons going so well, I tried to reflect on where I had gone wrong.  

*After hearing Alex talk to her student teacher, about where his lesson went wrong he blamed the students for their behaviour. She explained if the lesson didn't go well and the kids are misbehaving you need to look at why this is the case. The idea really stuck with me that if the lesson went wrong it isn't the students fault - instead there is something that you could have done to change the class dynamics

Reflection on where I may have gone wrong in that lesson:

• even though boys had asked to learn about this content they were disengaged from the lesson and activities - maybe topic of consent had gone on for too long
• class discussions may be becoming boring/irrelevant for some students e.g. they aren't having much input
• boys who are adding to the discussion are just calling out their answers which makes the conversation/discussion harder to continue - students to put hands up
• some students are starting their own personal discussions when a class discussion is in progress - if class was quiet and hands were going up to add to the discussion this may minimize this, also if it continues split up groups that are talking

Strategies for the future:

• more visual queues/outlines for boys to see on the board
• reinforcing respect - only one person talking at a time, hands up to add input, split students who are talking
• "Are you aware you are being rude right now?"
• World Kaf (to possibly help with group work) - write up on the board person's number and what they need to talk about e.g. discussion topic or question (for number of people within the group). Time limit per person (visual timer on board?).  They are only allowed to talk within time limit. If they haven't finished getting across their point they stop talking. If they don't have enough to say to fill up their time limit they sit quietly as a group

13/4: Mentor Group

Mentor Group

13th April 2016

This is a class list of girls within my mentor group. As their mentor I am there to help support these girls. This can be both mentally & emotionally, through supporting their wellbeing while at school. This can include both academics and co-curricular activities. 

An example of support from their wellbeing in regards to academics is tracking student progress through Gina, Term Orders/Reports and one-on-one conversations. I help to guide the girls with setting goals for improvement.

After receiving feedback within the first half of Term 2 common key findings were:

• They felt I was supportive and non-judgemental when they asked for advice/help
• I was doing a great job
• One thing to think about is getting the girls to work with others that they usually don't choose to work with
• One comment came back saying Mentor time seemed pointless

Within Term 3 I will get the girls to provide more feedback with more specific questions and include positives, negatives and improvements. I will also encourage them to give constructive criticism as there feedback will be more valuable that way. 

Possible PTC Evidence

Mallory Bish Practicing Teacher Criteria: Possible Evidence

PTC	Evidence:
Criterion #1: establish and maintain effective professional relationships focused on the learning and well-being of ākonga	-Leading rec swimming group -Attending all assemblies and meetings, keeping accurate attendance records and following up concerns with relevant people -Professional relationships with staff from different areas within the school e.g. Taylor Housemaster & Mentor teachers, Jim & Marcel for swimming, PE department, inquiry group, new staff catch ups, provisional staff meetings, attending staff events
Criterion #2: demonstrate commitment to promote the well-being of all ākonga	-Leading mentor group -Providing safe classroom environments
Criterion #3: demonstrate commitment to bicultural partnership in Aotearoa New Zealand	-Cultural sensitivity within classrooms -Help students to create cultural groups? -Incorporate te reo in class
Criterion #4: demonstrate commitment to ongoing professional learning and development of professional practice	-Meetings with Alex, department -PD/ inquiry group -Reflections
Criterion #5: show leadership that contributes to effective teaching and learning
Criterion #6: conceptulise, plan and implement an appropriate learning programme	-Unit plans/lesson outlines -Lesson plans -Working on questioning (questioning blog) -Learning intentions at the start of each lesson – what did they learn blog
Criterion #7: promote a collaborative inclusive and supportive learning environment	-Management strategies to engage and motivate students
Criterion #8: demonstrate in practice their knowledge and understanding of how ākonga learn	-Students can create links between prior and current learning
Criterion #9: respond effectively to the diverse language and cultural experiences, and the needs of individuals and groups of ākonga
Criterion #10: work effectively within the bicultural context of Aotearoa New Zealand
Criterion #11: analyse and appropriately use information which has been gathered formally and informally	-Year 9 unit -Year 11 unit
Criterion #12: use critical inquiry and problem-solving effectively in their professional practice	-Inquiry readings and reflections -Observations from Alex